This new demographic group consists of those born between 1954 and 1965, bridging the Baby Boomers and GenX groups. Jonathan Pontell, who defined this new group in a book a few years ago, called them Generation Jones because of their desire to keep up with the Jones’s.
Basically Jonathon Pontell and I arrived at similar conclusions – there are a lot of younger Baby Boomers and they have had very different life experiences than the older boomers. But we differ on how to treat this difference. He wants to rewrite the long-time definition of Baby Boomers by carving out this new group – Generation Jones, whereas I feel that although they need greater recognition, this group is still a part of the Baby Boomers. (Of course I could also question why the group with the most people doesn’t retain the name of Baby Boomers and the smaller group given a different name!)
Instead of rewriting the Baby Boom definition I want to work within the group. I look at the difference between the first and last Baby Boomers as being similar to Seniors and Freshmen in high school. Seniors in high school have a very different outlook, temperament, goals and maturity level than Freshmen yet both are in the same high school and call themselves high schoolers. Therefore, I don’t see a problem of having subsets within the Baby Boomer category. As I mentioned in the last post, this topic has greatly interested me and in fact I have been fiddling around with the idea of identifying three Baby Boomer subsets: True Boomers, Wanna Be’s and Tag Alongs.

I feel that using these subsets within the Baby Boomers group is a better solution than completely changing the definition of Baby Boomers and adding a new group. This new group, Generation Jones, includes people born between 1954 and 1964 and I am sure that those born in the mid 1950’s would strongly balk if told they were no longer considered as Baby Boomers. Perhaps those born in the early 1960’s wouldn’t mind being classified as Gen Jones instead of Baby Boomers but I still think this is the wrong approach. But no matter what you call them, this large group has become an important and finally recognized part of our society.
One of several problems with considering Jonesers part of the Baby Boom generation is that the attitudinal and values research clearly shows that Jonesers are much closer to Xers in most of those categories, so if we were going to lump Jonesers into another generation, it would make much more sense to include them with Xers. But the truth is that GenJones is unequivocally a distinct generation between Boomers and Xers.
ReplyDeleteThe only reason that all those people born between 1946 and 1964 were ever lumped into one generation was simply because a lot of kids were born then, but no generation ever before or since was defined by birth rates...it is an irrelevant variable.
So for me, there's no way that I could ever see including Generation Jones as some kind of subset of Boomers...I believe that is absolutely innacurate. And watching how much traction this whole Generation Jones thing is gaining, it looks like it won't be too long now until our long-mislabeled generation is finally recognized as the distinct entity which it is.